It is absolutely necessary that this question of legal plunder should be determined, and there are only three solutions of it:
1. When the few plunder the many.
2. When everybody plunders everybody else.
3. When nobody plunders anybody.
Partial plunder, universal plunder, absence of plunder, amongst these we have to make our choice. The law can only produce one of these results. [THE LAW, 61]I believe this is correct. Partial plunder seems to characterize most of history. I say we should choose the third alternative, absence of plunder. The United States Constitution was a good beginning for a system of political economy that might approximate the third alternative. Alas, over time the Constitution has been lost [see Barnett, Restoring The Lost Constitution], and our system of political economy seems to have become an excellent illustration of universal plunder. As you might guess, neither partial plunder nor universal plunder offer paths by which prosperity can be enjoyed by all.